Question
ETS样题第2题学术讨论范文
Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.
In your response, you should do the following.
• Express and support your opinion.
• Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
Doctor Gupta
This week, I want you to discuss assessment criteria. Some schoolteachers give high grades (marks) only to those students who perform well on their homework assignments and tests. Other teachers, however, may give high grades to students who have worked very hard on their assignments but have not performed so well. Which approach do you think is better: Giving grades based only on performance, or grading students not just on performance but also on their effort?
Kelly
I think grades should be based on performance only. It’s a matter of fairness. I’d be really upset if another student got nearly the same grade that I did when I turned in work that was almost perfect and the other student’s work had incorrect answers or unclear ideas. It wouldn’t matter to me if they worked harder.
Paul
Sure, evaluation should mainly be based upon the student’s performance, but hard work should count for something. A student who works hard, even when the final grade isn’t the highest in the class, builds character, which will benefit the student later in life when they go to university or apply for a job.
范文正文
I think it is better for teachers to strike a balance between performance and effort when grading students. This is because learning is a long-term, continuous process, and grades should reflect not only academic results but also the motivation and consistent efforts that students invest in their studies.【表语从句+not only...but also...并列结构+定语从句】This approachprovides a more complete picture of their overall capabilities. For example, when a business teacher adopts a grading system that weighs performance at 60% and effort at 40%,【时间状语从句+定语从句】students are encouraged to actively participate in group discussions and classroom presentations to achieve higher marks. To be specific, in a group discussion on franchising, students are expected to devote their time and energy to analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of franchise rights, sharing their perspectives, and respecting the views of others. Likewise, when preparing for a class presentation on the SWOT analysis of successful franchise cases, such as McDonald’s or Starbucks, they may spend several days consulting relevant sources, designing clear slides, and practicing polished speeches. Although such tasks can be demanding,【让步状语从句】they allow teachers to better assess students’ critical thinking, teamwork spirit, and communication skills based on their involvement. In conclusion, while performance remains important,【让步状语从句】students’ efforts throughout the learning process deserve to be taken into account as part of their overall evaluation.
写作思路和特色
这道题是托福学术讨论写作ETS样题第2题。在这道个人偏好类题目中，教授提问：老师给学生高分时，是只根据（作业和考试）表现打分，还是既看表现也看学生的努力程度？Kelly认为老师应该只根据表现来打分，这样才公平；而Paul则认为老师评分时不仅要看学生的表现，还应该认可他们的努力。因为努力是一种好的品质，将来上大学或者找工作时会对他们很有帮助。
这篇文章采用了“个人观点+因果论证+举例论证+总结”的写作结构，主张在学生评分标准中，老师应该同时兼顾学习表现与努力程度。首先，文章认为，学习是一个长期且持续的过程，成绩不应该只反映作业和考试等学术成果，也应该体现学生在学习过程中所投入的学习动力与持续努力。因此，这种评分方式能更全面地展现学生的整体能力。接着，文章以商科课堂教学为例，具体说明如果老师将最终成绩中60%分配给作业和考试表现，40%分配给平时努力，学生将更积极地参与课堂讨论与展示。具体来说，在小组讨论特许经营时，学生会花时间分析加盟连锁的利弊，表达自己的观点并尊重他人意见；在准备如麦当劳或星巴克的SWOT分析展示时，也将花费数日收集资料、制作课件并练习演讲。虽然这些任务具有挑战性，却能帮助老师从学生的投入程度中评估其批判性思维、团队合作与沟通能力。最后，文章总结并强调，虽然作业和考试表现依然重要，但学生在学习过程中的持续努力同样值得纳入评分体系。
文章语言表达流畅、术语使用准确，如“critical thinking”, “SWOT analysis”等词汇增强了文章的专业性和说服力；结构清晰，先提出核心观点，再通过具体案例进行展开，最后重申主张，逻辑上由总到分、层层推进，例子紧扣论点，有效支撑了“学生努力应计入评分”的中心思想。
